Joanna Garland vs Sara Saito Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Sep at 07:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Garland vs S. Saito

TPE
1
Win
Played
1
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Garland 1 - 1 Saito
They have played 5 sets in total, with Joanna Garland winning 3 and Sara Saito winning 2. The last match between Joanna Garland and Sara Saito was at the WTA Changsha Open - Changsha, 03-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Joanna Garland getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Garland | 1 |
| Saito | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) WTA Changsha Open - Changsha(09-03-25)
(QF) W25 Makinohara(10-06-23)
J. Garland vs S. Saito H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $150,725 | Career Prize Money | $12,193 |
| 68.07% (275-129) | Career Total W/L | 61.27% (106-67) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 16 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 46.15% (6-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Garland vs S. Saito Match Preview:
- Recently, Saito's second serve points win rate is better than Garland's, with 39.95% compared to 36.82%. Does this indicate Saito has a slight edge in second serve play? It might.
- Return game data shows Saito excelling with better stats on both first and second serve returns, with 52.69% and 32.91% compared to Garland's 45.72% and 31.19%.
- Under pressure, Garland saves 50% of breakpoints, outperforming Saito, who saves 43.53%. Could this advantage Garland in crucial moments? Possibly.
- Over the past year, Garland has performed significantly better overall, winning 80.85% of matches compared to Saito's 48%.
- Garland's best-performing surface is Hard, with a 71% win rate, while Saito thrives on Indoor Hard surfaces, boasting a 68% success rate.
- Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments, but Garland has a higher win percentage of 86.15% compared to Saito's 53.85%.
- In their only previous head-to-head match, Saito emerged victorious, but Garland won one of the three sets played.
- When under pressure in deciding sets, Garland holds a higher success rate of 75% compared to Saito’s 50%, which could be pivotal if the match is closely contested.
- Break point conversion in recent form gives Saito a slight edge over Garland, with Saito converting 39.11% compared to Garland’s 38.31%.
Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performance metrics and the historical head-to-head record, Saito shows a slightly stronger second serve and return game, which are critical components in tennis success.
However, Garland’s impressive overall win rate over the last year, notably superior at dealing with pressure situations, and strong surface-specific performance on Hard courts provide a compelling case for their potential to overcome Saito. Advanced head-to-head outcomes might suggest an edge to Saito, but Garland’s notable success in deciding sets could neutralize this advantage.
In conclusion, while Saito has certain strengths, Garland’s broader statistical achievements and pressure play resilience suggest they could be the more likely victor in this upcoming encounter.
Joanna Garland vs Sara Saito Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Garland vs S. Saito H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 26 | Games Won | 19 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 2:13:1 | Average Match Time | 2:13:1 |
| 58% (78/135) | 1st Serve % | 55% (87/158) |
| 51% (40/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (44/87) |
| 49% (28/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (28/71) |
| 56% (14/25) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (10/15) |
| 54% (86/158) | Return Points Win % | 50% (67/135) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Garland Recent Matches Played
S. Saito Recent Matches Played

J. Garland vs S. Saito Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.07% (275/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.27% (106/67) |
| 65.59% (587/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.21% (227/163) |
| 57.60% (4629/3407) | Games Win/Loss | 53.63% (1914/1655) |
| 70.00% (168/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.98% (49/37) |
| 65.57% (40/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.26% (21/17) |
| 64.63% (53/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 78.57% (33/9) |
| 66.67% (14/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 870 | Aces Total | 179 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1144 | Total Double Faults | 537 |
| 1:37:3 | Average Match Time | 1:32:37 |
| 450.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.75 |
| 62% (14747/23866) | 1st Serve % | 66% (7335/11071) |
| 65% (9656/14747) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4483/7335) |
| 49% (4451/9119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1728/3736) |
| 48% (1603/3332) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (728/1486) |
| 48% (11612/24375) | Return Points Win % | 47% (5274/11211) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Main Tour W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 68.20% (178/83) | Challenger W/L | 65.13% (99/53) |
| 72.22% (78/30) | Futures W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 68% (271/399) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (102/169) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (35/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (13/32) |
| 54% (49/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (27/46) |
| 93% (260/243) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (98/89) |
| 7% (260/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (98/9) |
| 22% (144/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (73/15) |